Where did the D-backs land? the Dodgers? the Twins? any teams that are crushing their pre season predictions? Seems like those teams are at least 1 to 2 games above expectations.
This exercise was done with the numbers teams have actually accumulated, looking at the Season Stats tab under the league Standings page on Fantrax. The point wasn't to do a retrospective of accuracy against the preseason projections, which only used Fangraphs' Depth Charts projections (used mostly because they're one of the few projection systems to include Holds), so preseason win averages aren't taken into account. The computer would expect a team with Arizona's to-date schedule and statistical output to have won 5.336 of their games, and they've won 6. Similarly, it puts the Dodgers at 4.732, and they've won 5. Twins average 7.908 games won given the parameters, so the simulation comes within .082 wins of nailing that one.
Also, I'll repeat the refrain that the average win numbers are pretty useless. I include them because it's easier to gauge variation and standard deviation from the guesses. However, most win totals for any given team capped at a max of 20% during the preseason. The current outlook for the Diamondbacks is just shy of 10. That fits with the model, where 10 wins for Arizona still happened about 7% of the time. As long as the outcome appears within the meatier part of the bell-curve, it's generally a pretty good outcome. I'll still check for biases at the end of the season, and if Arizona continues to outperform expectations, it could force a look at how statistic accumulation functions. The simulation part of the program, given strong correlation using real-life statistics, seems to be on the right track.
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Jun 14, 2019 15:57:34 GMT -8
In doing some bias tests against the predictions, I noticed a couple things that I could fix. The program seemed to be overrating bad teams ever so slightly, for a start. So, I implemented a change I've been wanting to make for a while:
I had been simulating the each stat category for each matchup based on where that team ranked in that stat (i.e. 30 points for the top team in Rs, 1 point for the bottom team). After today, the program will base the winning percentages for categories on the Z-score. That is, essentially the variance of the overall statistic compared to the rest of the league. If a team has far more or far less than the majority of the league in any given statistic, the program will take that into account.
So far, I'm noticing that it fixed the problem of the basement teams. For example, the Rangers are now estimated to accrue an average of 0.01149 wins instead of .4. Meanwhile, teams that are towards the bottom of the standings on statistics but more roughly towards the mean are ranked higher - the Marlins added another .5 win, for example.
tl;dr - if you notice a seemingly big change in percentages next week with little rhyme/reason (my odds at the NL West were cut roughly in half), there is in fact a reason. It should theoretically be even more accurate now.
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Jun 18, 2019 3:38:01 GMT -8
Already found something that was skewing results gained from the new Z-Score-based probabilities. The way I notate teams that shouldn't accrue enough innings or at-bats per week was devaluing some teams at the top of categories like ERA, WHIP, AVG, and OPS. This is the result after fixing the issue.
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Jun 24, 2019 14:10:41 GMT -8
Wild Card Race
Here are the current odds at winning a wild card berth. Current division winners are excluded, even if they aren't the favorite to win the division in the long run (see Braves vs. Mets). Also, to be included, the team must have a >5% chance at the playoffs. The percentages here are taken from the times that the teams won a wild card divided by every iteration that team did not win the division, which is why numbers will look different from above.
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Jul 3, 2019 6:39:45 GMT -8
Note: corrected a Week 8 matchup in the program, where I erroneously had Seattle beating Tampa. When putting in these things manually, mistakes are bound to happen. While Seattle is still in the driver's seat for that final AL Wild Card, it took them from about a 70% chance to just under 50%
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Jul 29, 2019 9:21:36 GMT -8
Here is a proposed solution to the Dodgers dilemma. This doesn't take YTD results into consideration, instead relying solely on projections. I'll be posting both for the sake of attempting to determine which is more accurate
Post by Rockies GM (Dan) on Aug 5, 2019 18:22:21 GMT -8
Wild Card Race
Q: What is up with Seattle? They clearly have the third best outlook in the AL, but they've got lower odds than some behind them.
A: Seattle has lost to Minnesota, New York, and Oakland, they also rank 24th out of 30th in Wins, which would break the tie if they win again against Oakland to tie the head-to-head matchup. What that means is that Seattle probably has to end the season with the third wild card spot uncontested in order to secure it. That's possible, but not as likely as you'd think if you just looked at the graph.
Q: In the NL Chart, where are the Cubs?
A: Look under the apex of the Mets' curve. They're there. Somehow, mere fractions of a percentage point separate the Mets and the Cubs at every single win. I haven't really seen two curves so similar since I began posting these.
Q: Speaking of the Mets?
A: The Mets have lost to both the Pirates and Mets, although they have the tiebreaker over the Diamondbacks. That's why, while their curve puts them right up there with the Cubs and Diamondbacks, they are a distant fifth in terms of odds. In fact, the Cubs, Diamondbacks and Pirates have a whole mess of tiebreakers between them, which is why the Pirates are behind the other two, despite looking like they should have a leg up.
Q: Okay, but why are the Pirates and Cubs here and not the Brewers, who have the third best odds at the NL Central?
A: This is as the league stands today, and the Brewers beat the Pirates, which means if the season ended today, they're your NL Central champs. The simulation clearly expects that to change as the NL Central beats up on each other these final four weeks, but it hasn't happened yet. Same logic applies to the NL East, where the Mets are slight favorites over the Phillies to prevail with the title, but would lose the tiebreaker today.
Q: When you say the Twins have a 100% chance at a wild card, are you saying that they're not going to win the division?
A: No, voice inside my head. Why are you asking all these questions? This looks at each team's odds of winning the wildcard if they don't win the division. So, the 100% in the Twins case simply means that if they don't win the division, they WILL win a wild card. Look at the previous post. They clearly have a shot at winning the AL Central
Padres GM (Amy): @hollah, that is truly brave work
Mar 11, 2024 5:47:59 GMT -8
Reds GM (Pat H.): Hi, my name is Pat and I'm addicted to fantasy baseball.
Mar 11, 2024 6:26:35 GMT -8
Padres GM (Amy): i tried to quit and we see how that went
Mar 11, 2024 6:27:33 GMT -8
*
Cardinals GM (John C): Quote from Amy: "Just When I Think I'm Out, They Pull Me Back In."
Mar 14, 2024 6:54:31 GMT -8
Reds GM (Pat H.): We will try Round 5 of the draft on Fantrax. You are able to fill your queue with players now. It doesn't start until Round 4 is over.
Mar 14, 2024 7:24:36 GMT -8
Padres GM (Amy): Pretty sure Yankees pick is invalid as Martorella just released
Mar 17, 2024 13:08:03 GMT -8
*
Pirates GM (Hollar): Amy, are you gonna join us on Discord any time soon? It's the new hot place for shitposting.
Mar 19, 2024 0:25:28 GMT -8
Padres GM (Amy): so i have discord but i think i lost my invite to this league or something
Mar 19, 2024 6:01:36 GMT -8
Pirates GM (Hollar): If I knew how to send those, I would send you one.
Mar 21, 2024 1:30:28 GMT -8
Padres GM (Amy): Thanks maybe some day
Mar 21, 2024 15:44:05 GMT -8
Cubs GM (Beau): Looking for holds. Let's do an early season trade!
Apr 11, 2024 14:16:09 GMT -8
Nationals GM (Preston): Sorry to those who have reached out lately; work and life have been busy. Continue to be in the market for CI/RP!
Jun 10, 2024 18:16:28 GMT -8
Pirates GM (Hollar): I cannot begin to understand work and life being busy. Go to jail.
Jun 14, 2024 23:43:29 GMT -8
Reds GM (Pat H.): This week lasts until July 28. The minimum AB to qualify for AVG & OPS is 142. The minimum IP to qualify for ERA & WHIP is 42. Disregard what fantrax says about MIN/MAX for this week.
Jul 17, 2024 13:26:11 GMT -8
Reds GM (Pat H.): This is the final week for free agency pickups
Aug 27, 2024 10:25:21 GMT -8
Reds GM (Pat H.): Please vote if you are returning next year in the poll in the off-season board.
Sept 11, 2024 14:00:08 GMT -8
*
Reds GM (Pat H.): Please archive (copy and paste) your Proboards roster in the off-season board on Proboards. We still need 6 teams to answer the returning for next season question.
Sept 25, 2024 5:25:26 GMT -8